Sign in or register
for additional privileges

Civic Media Project

Eric Gordon, Author

You appear to be using an older verion of Internet Explorer. For the best experience please upgrade your IE version or switch to a another web browser.

Harrasment and Karen Klein: A Case Study


Morgan Jaffe

This case study takes a look at the events that surrounded the harassment of bus monitor Karen Klein in Greece, NY in 2012 and its relation to civic media, participatory culture, and produsage. By doing so, the case aims to be an example that shows the power of civic media, and how its participatory practices have changed the production and consumption of traditional media. 

As discussed in Convergence Culture (Jenkins 2006),  Broadcasting in the 21st Century (Rudin 2011),  and “Dimensions of Digital Media Literacy and the Relationship with Social Exclusion” (Park 2012), civic media—founded on the ideals of participation, social justice, and transparency—is being redefined not by larger media companies, but by consumers and amateur, user-generated content, causing a shift in the relationship between broadcaster, listener, and viewer. Where at one time large companies and organizations had been in charge of media outlets, today, through the Internet, almost anyone can become a broadcaster—which is exactly what happened with the case of Karen Klein. 

In June 2012, four 7th grade students from the Greece Athena Middle School in Greece, NY videotaped themselves bullying Klein on their bus ride home. The boys appeared on the film, calling Klein a “bitch” and a “fat ass,” mocking her appearance and age, threatening her, and making her cry. These videos, user-generated content entitled “Making the Bus Monitor Cry,”  “Bus Monitor Harassment,”  and “Bus Monitor Harassment 2,”  were later posted throughout various social media sites and outlets. While the videos of these boys bullying Klein were originally posted on Facebook, a user who was not one of the bullies reposted the recordings on YouTube. Within a day the videos went viral, demonstrating a perfect example of participatory culture. 

Image 1: Screenshot of the video “Making the Bus Monitor Cry” from YouTube.

Image 2: Screenshot of the video “Bus Monitor Harassment

Image 3: Screenshot of the video “Bus Monitor Harassment 2

The digital world and Internet culture is based around this participatory culture (Hobbs 2010; Jenkins 2006; Jenkins et al 2006; Park 2012).1 In “Confronting the Challenges of a Participatory Culture: Media Education for the 21st Century,” Jenkins et al. define the term as:

. . . a culture with relatively low barriers to artistic expression and civic engagement,  strong support for creating and sharing one’s creations, and some type of informal  mentorship whereby what is known by the most experienced is passed along to novices. 


In many ways, participatory culture can be thought of as shifting away from consumer culture. As Jenkins et al. explain, participatory culture requires users to be extremely active in their media use—both in their creation as well as in their consumption. 

In Convergence Culture, Henry Jenkins further makes it clear that media, no matter its own medium or message, cannot exist without participatory culture and a new type of active consumer.  In her book Digital and Media Literacy: A Plan of Action, Renee Hobbs explains that to be a part of participatory culture, it is absolutely necessary to incorporate both creating as well as sharing.  People are not just consumers, but also producers and contributors by broadcasting different types of media online. Additionally, there is no longer a clear distinction between producer and user, broadcaster and viewer. 

The boys who filmed themselves taunting Klein, however, are not the focal point of participatory culture within this example. It’s the audience who watched the videos (“the active consumers”) that make the event so key. 

After all, an important aspect of participatory culture is that the audiences cannot simply remain spectators, solely consuming information presented to them; rather, audiences themselves need to create their own content and interact with others doing the same. 


The online reaction to the videos of Klein being bullied was tremendous. Audiences posted response videos on YouTube and there were multiple discussion threads about the incident on Reddit3—a participatory site that (based on points and voting) shares web content such as text posts, videos, and other links. The more points (and community approval and awareness) a post gets, the more likely the content will reach the front page, where the most users will see it. These Reddit users were incredibly active consumers, and their sharing of the videos was essential.

Image 4: Screenshot of one of the Reddit threads discussing the Karen Klein videos


Image 5: Screenshot of a second Reddit thread discussing the Karen Klein videos

After much discussion, Reddit users began looking for further information, finding the name and location of the school, Karen Klein’s Facebook profile, and the names, Facebook pages, and phone numbers of her tormentors. After much of the personal information was posted, Reddit moderators stepped in, shutting down the thread for privacy violations. Moving the discussion to another site, the videos were also shared on 4chan—an image-based bulletin board community where users can post comments and share images. (The discussion surrounding Karen Klein, however, no longer exists, as 4chan has no archive and threads expire). 4chan users reposted the information that had been shared on Reddit, again sharing the same information that had previously been posted on Reddit; but this time also including their home addresses. The users had found out Klein’s tormentor’s information, and now they wanted to find a way hold them accountable.

The users on Reddit and 4chan are perfect examples of produsers. In Blogs, Wikipedia, Second Life and Beyond: From Production to Produsage, Axel Bruns defines produsers as people who can be both users and producers (2008).  In the case with Karen Klein, Reddit and 4Chan users were both consuming the video her bullies posted, as well as producing discussion that caused the video to go viral. Bruns further describes how produsers are interacting with content production through produsage, which is “the collaborative and continuous building and extending of existing content in pursuit of further improvement” (ibid, 21)  Put simply, the users on Reddit were participating in a form of produsage, “extending” the existing videos by attempting to improve Klein’s life situation by raising awareness and making a change within an offline space.

As Bruns further writes, it is about “transferring knowledge” and turning internet consumption and information from a static practice into a shared space where users participate and share with each other (ibid, 208).  People began calling the Greece school system and the student’s homes, demanding action. 4chan users posted that Klein only stayed at her job because it was the only work she could find, and she could not afford to quit. One Reddit user, Max Sidorov, started a fundraiser on Indiegogo (a crowdfunding website) with the original intention to raise money for Klein to go on a vacation.4  The users Reddit and 4chan users further participated in produasage, when they built awareness of her situation and helped raise money through the Indiegogo campaign and researching to find out the perpetrators in this incident, and see to it that they faced consequences for their actions. 

Image 6: A screenshot of the Indiegogo page started to raise money for Karen Klein by Max Sidorov.


After the video went viral, being broadcasted on both social media sites and in traditional news and print, the campaign raised over $700,000. Klein later used a portion of the money to start an anti-bullying organization: The Karen Klein Foundation. Additionally, the students in question were suspended from school for a year, required to complete 50 hours of community service with senior citizens, and had to attend a formal program in bullying prevention. 

Image 7: A screenshot of the Karen Klein Foundation website.

Along with online, collaborative environments of participatory culture, produsers (much like the Reddit and 4chan users) are completely changing and blurring how media is made, distributed, and consumed, causing a shift within the traditional top-down media and release of content. It was not until after the story went viral through social media sites that the mainstream media discovered and reported the story in magazines, newspapers, television, and radio. It is important to note that top-down media did not drive this news story; this became a story for traditional broadcasters after it was discovered, discussed, and driven to a viral status due to civic media, participatory culture, and produsage. 


References


Bruns, Axel. 2008. Blogs, Wikipedia, Second Life and Beyond: From Production to Produsage. New York: Peter Lang Publishing.

CapitalTrigga. 2012. Making the Bus Monitor Cry. Video on YouTube, 10:08. June 19. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l93wAqnPQwk. 

CapitalTrigga. 2012. Bus Monitor Harassment 2. Video on YouTube, 2:23. June 19. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SBedTlo7BDs&feature=plcp.

Hobbs, Renee. 2010. Digital and Media Literacy: A Plan of Action. Washington, D.C.: John S. and James L. Knight Foundation and Aspen Institute.

jelloleaf. 2012. Kids call bus monitor ‘fat’ until she cries and they still don’t stop. Thread on Reddit. June 20. http://redd.it/vb5gj. 

Jenkins, Henry. 2006. Convergence Culture: Where Old and New Media Collide. New York: New York University Press.

Jenkins, Henry, Katie Clinton, Ravi Purushatma, Alice Robison, and Margaret Weigel. 2006. “Confronting the Challenges of a Participatory Culture: Media Education for the 21st  Century.” The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation: http://www.macfound.org/media/article_pdfs/JENKINS_WHITE_PAPER.PDF.

Manders2211. 2012. Bus Monitor Harassment. Video on YouTube, 1:28. June 20. https:// www.youtube.com/watch?v=74bkNuQv2I8.

Park, Sora. 2012. “Dimensions of Digital Media Literacy and the Relationship with Social Exclusion.” Media International Australia 142: 87-100. 

razorsheldon. 2012. CALL TO ARMS. PLEASE READ. Thread on Reddit. June 20th. http://redd.it/vbfxq. 

Rudin, Richard. 2011. Broadcasting in the 21st Century. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Sidorov, Max. 2012. “Lets [sic] Give Karen - The bus monitor - H Klein A Vacation!” Indiegogo. June 20. https://www.indiegogo.com/projects/lets-give-karen-the-bus-monitor-h-klein-a-vacation--6.

Comment on this page
 

Discussion of "Harrasment and Karen Klein: A Case Study"

Add your voice to this discussion.

Checking your signed in status ...


Related:  Horizontal Networking and the Music of Idle No MoreBlogging for Truth: Ai Weiwei’s Citizen Investigation Project on China’s 2008 Sichuan Earthquake#aufschrei – The Role of Twitter for Feminist Activism and as a Platform for Alternative PublicsNewsActivist: Using globally networked writing to facilitate cross-campus dialogue and engagementRoom to Tell: Designing Affectively Engaging Civic Opportunities with New Media for Adolescents Hospitalized with Cystic FibrosisFrom #destroythejoint to far reaching digital activism: Feminist revitalisation stemming from social media and reaching beyondThe Se Non Ora Quando Social Movement in ItalyBinders Full of Election Memes: Participatory Culture invades the 2012 U.S. ElectionTwitter Use and Negative Campaigning: A Case Study from the World’s Largest ElectionInternet Parties: The Internet as Party, Policy, Platform, & Persuasive SymbolismPadres y Jovenes Unidos: Student Empowerment through Critical Media LiteracyThe 2013 Gezi Park Protest and #resistgeziHacking Politics: Civic Struggles to Politicize TechnologiesSocial Media Use and Political Activism in Turkey: 140journos, the Post of Others, and Vote and Beyond38 DegreesAnother Promise’s Digital Civic Network and SamsungFort Vancouver Mobile ProjectAn #EpicFail #FTW: Considering the Discursive Changes And Civic Engagement of #MyNYPD“More Than A Quota”: Youth-Led Creative Arts and Advocacy About the Stop & Frisk PolicyThe Human Rights Campaign Facebook LogoConnected MessagesThe #WalkMyWorld ProjectIdle No More in Canada: Dissent, Resonance, and a Middle GroundCuban Blogosphere: an Scenario for Political Debate and DissentThe Civic Cloud: A Public Access Model and the InternetGalas: Mobilizing and Managing Volunteer Humanitarian Efforts Online During Euromaidan Protests in UkraineCitizen journalism and Civic Inclusion: Access DorsetIt Gets Better ProjectThe 2013 Protests in BrazilCivic Media for Civic Intelligence: Product and Process in a Dynamic, Student-led Research and Action LaboratoryCityBeat: A Social Media Data Visualization Platform for JournalistsPop-Up Newsroom: “We Are Where You Are”350.org: A Case of Online-to-Offline ActivismMídiaNINJA and the Rise of Citizen Journalism in BrazilKony 2012: Using Technology for EmpathyMissing Intentionality: the Limitations of Social Media Analysis for Participatory Urban DesignThe ‘Solutionistic’ Logic of the National Day of Civic HackingStrike Debt and the Rolling Jubilee: Building a Debt Resistance MovementMoving from Perceptions to Realities: Lessons Learned from HollowUnited Colors of DissentThe Community Media Drupal Project“Bury Until They Change Their Ways”: The Digg Patriots And/As User-Generated CensorshipSingapore Memory Project: Producing Public Memory through Social Media Digital Empowerment AcademyMarriage equality, Facebook profiles pictures, and civic participationCommunity Radio as Civic Media: The case of Radio al-Balad 92.4FM in Amman, JordanIdle No More by Liz (beta)Iran, the U.S., and Online DiplomacyWebsite to Weibo: Activating the Local Communication Network and Civic Engagement in a Diverse CityPOPPYN: Presenting Our Perspective on Philly Youth NewsExploring Net Neutrality with Mozilla WebmakerHacking for GoldYour Story Goes Here: A Case Study Investigating Digital Storytelling and City BuildingMeu RioThe PolyXpress Mobile Ethnographic Storytelling System