Sign in or register
for additional privileges

Civic Media Project

Eric Gordon, Author

You appear to be using an older verion of Internet Explorer. For the best experience please upgrade your IE version or switch to a another web browser.

Hacking Politics: Civic Struggles to Politicize Technologies

Sebastian Kubitschko


Despite the longstanding equating of hacking as infused with political significance, the scope and style of hackers’ engagement with institutionalized politics remains poorly understood. Based on face-to-face interviews, participant observations and media analysis over three years (2011-2014), this case study of the Chaos Computer Club (CCC)—Europe’s largest and one of the world’s oldest hacker collectives—fills parts of this gap. It shows that hackers practice a wide range of insider and outsider tactics related to media technologies and infrastructures (MTI). The rationale is to examine hackers as actors that practice politics through, with and about MTI and by doing so to deepen the understanding of contemporary civic engagements. By considering the CCC as a civic organization that emphatically engages with democratic constellations it challenges common sense assumptions guiding understandings of the intersection of civic culture, technologies and institutionalized politics.

Considering transformations of civic engagement and politics, hackers might not necessarily be the first actors that come to mind. “Hackers” is often used as a catchall phrase to describe almost any computer-related crime and tend to be portrayed as anti-social, possibly dangerous individuals, who attack systems, invade privacy and even threaten national security (Coleman 2012). Governments’ and mainstream media’s obsession with the activities of particular groups—most prominently Anonymous and WikiLeaks—further reinforce this labeling. 

Founded in 1981 in Germany and with a membership figure of around 4500 the CCC stands in stark contrast to such stereotyping and criminalization. The Club is a heterogeneous collection of multi-socialized and multi-determined citizens that bring together knowledge, experience and skills related to the functioning and political consequences of MTI. 


For over three decades its members have been engaging in the area of conflict between technological and social developments.

While the Club’s organizational structure is based on decentralized local groups, prominent spokespersons and long-term members ensure that the collective communicates its political aims (more or less) coherently beyond the circle of like-minded people. Accordingly the CCC acts as an organized civic collective or what can be referred to as a civil society organization. Ever since its establishment the Club does not only practice so-called hacktivism (Jordan and Taylor 1998), but in fact engages in a plurality of political activities by acting through, with and about MTI (Kubitschko, 2015). In more concrete terms the tree attributes indicate the following practices.

First, the hackers are acting through MTI. This denotes that similar to most political organizations nowadays (Rucht 2013, 249-268), the Club’s internal modes of organization and coordination starkly rely on mediated communication amongst its members. At the same time the CCC acts through MTI by utilizing contemporary technologies in creative, explorative, playful or subversive ways. By reverse engineering a suspicious hard drive in October 2011, for example, the organization discovered that German government agencies were illegally using surveillance software.

Second, the CCC critically engages with MTI by sustaining alternative communication infrastructures like The Onion Router (Tor)—client software enhancing online anonymity by directing Internet traffic through a global volunteer network of servers. In addition the CCC is running one of the most used Extensible Messaging and Presence Protocol (XMPP) servers worldwide – an open technology, which powers a wide range of applications including instant messaging, multi-party chat, voice and video calls. It is important to note that “alternative” in this context should not be treated synonymously with “autonomy.” As Chris Kelty puts it, "independence from power is not absolute; it is provisional and structured in response to the historically constituted layering of power and control within the infrastructures of computing and communication" (Kelty 2008, 9).
 
Third, CCC members are acting about MTI by articulating their knowledge, skills and experiences. On one hand, this is achieved by communicating to the general public via social and mainstream media channels. On the other, the Club has increasingly direct interactions with relevant actors like judges and legislators. Given the growing relevance of media environments for political constellations mainstream media continue to be exceptionally significant for actors to publicly voice their concerns (Couldry 2012). Over recent years both the amount of media coverage as well as the frequency of access by CCC members to mainstream media has increased drastically. Besides writing articles and maintaining blogs for quality outlets CCC members are regular interview partner to various well-established media and act as sources to numerous news media. In 2013 alone, the Club’s spokesperson had 8973 requests by media representatives via email. Parallel to these media related practices, interactions with institutionalized politics continue to grow in quantity and quality. Over the past decade, the CCC has been requested as an official expert by the German constitutional court on five occasions—among others, related to the use of computerized voting machines. At the same time, the Club is advising all major political parties in Germany and two CCC members took part in the German parliament’s committee on “Internet and Digital Society.”

Acting with, through and about MTI are interlocking arrangements that enable the CCC not only to question and supervise  technological developments, but also to practice both ‘defensive’ and ‘offensive’ modes of engagement Cohen and Arato 1992, 548-563). On one hand, their engagements are directed inward to civil society by supporting emancipatory practices related to communicative infrastructures. On the other, their activities are directed outward to institutionalized politics. By doing so, the Chaos Computer Club politicizes issues that otherwise might be understood as solely technological and are part of defining the predominant conception of what is understood as political.




References


Cohen, Jean, and Andrew Arato. 1992. Civil Society and Political Theory. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

Coleman, Gabriella. 2012. Coding Freedom: The Ethics and Aesthetics of Hacking. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Couldry, Nick. 2012. Media, Society, World: Social Theory and Digital Media Practice. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

Jordan, Tim, and Paul Taylor. 1998. “A Sociology of Hackers.” The Sociological Review 46 (4): 757–780.

Kelty, Christopher. 2008. Two Bits: The Cultural Significance of Free Software. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

Kubitschko, Sebastian. Forthcoming. 2015. “Hackers’ Media Practices.” Convergence 21 (3).

Rosanvallon, Pierre. 2008. Counter-Democracy: Politics in an Age of Distrust. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Rucht, Dieter. 2013. “Protest Movements and Their Media Usages.” In Mediation and Protest Movements, edited by Bart Cammaerts, Alice Mattoni and Patrick McCurdy, 249–268. Bristol, UK: Intellect.

Comment on this page
 

Discussion of "Hacking Politics: Civic Struggles to Politicize Technologies"

Add your voice to this discussion.

Checking your signed in status ...


Related:  Crowdfunding Civic Action: Pimp My Carroça350.org: A Case of Online-to-Offline Activism“Bury Until They Change Their Ways”: The Digg Patriots And/As User-Generated CensorshipCitizen journalism and Civic Inclusion: Access DorsetDIY Citizenship in the “New Northern Ireland”: the Case of a Belfast MakerspaceThe Civic Cloud: A Public Access Model and the InternetIt Gets Better Project Exploring Net Neutrality with Mozilla WebmakerA Report from the First Hackathon at the White HouseCityBeat: A Social Media Data Visualization Platform for JournalistsTwitter Use and Negative Campaigning: A Case Study from the World’s Largest ElectionStrike Debt and the Rolling Jubilee: Building a Debt Resistance MovementGuerrilla Research Tactics: Alternative Research Methods in Urban EnvironmentsBinders Full of Election Memes: Participatory Culture invades the 2012 U.S. Election#aufschrei – The Role of Twitter for Feminist Activism and as a Platform for Alternative PublicsThe 2013 Gezi Park Protest and #resistgeziAn #EpicFail #FTW: Considering the Discursive Changes And Civic Engagement of #MyNYPDYour Story Goes Here: A Case Study Investigating Digital Storytelling and City BuildingThe Se Non Ora Quando Social Movement in ItalyMarriage equality, Facebook profiles pictures, and civic participationMídiaNINJA and the Rise of Citizen Journalism in BrazilPop-Up Newsroom: “We Are Where You Are”The #WalkMyWorld Project38 DegreesThe Human Rights Campaign Facebook LogoFort Vancouver Mobile ProjectIdle No More in Canada: Dissent, Resonance, and a Middle GroundHarrasment and Karen Klein: A Case StudyUnited Colors of DissentCode for America: Scaling Civic Engagement Through Open Data and Software DesignMobilizing Collective Urban Actions through MicroActsThe ‘Solutionistic’ Logic of the National Day of Civic HackingHorizontal Networking and the Music of Idle No MoreHacking for GoldSocial Media Use and Political Activism in Turkey: 140journos, the Post of Others, and Vote and BeyondFrom #destroythejoint to far reaching digital activism: Feminist revitalisation stemming from social media and reaching beyondIran, the U.S., and Online DiplomacyKony 2012: Using Technology for EmpathyCommunity Radio as Civic Media: The case of Radio al-Balad 92.4FM in Amman, JordanConnected MessagesThe 2013 Protests in BrazilIdle No More by Liz (beta)Becoming Civic: Fracking, Air Pollution and Environmental Sensing TechnologiesGalas: Mobilizing and Managing Volunteer Humanitarian Efforts Online During Euromaidan Protests in UkraineMissing Intentionality: the Limitations of Social Media Analysis for Participatory Urban DesignAnother Promise’s Digital Civic Network and Samsung